Pocket-Sized

NONSEXUAL WAYS TO BE INTIMATE WITH SOMEONE

fuckyeahkinkshaming:

activistaabsentee:

meth-smoothie:

fuckingconversations:

Link 1  <Personal & Body Care

Link 2 <Emotional & Psychological Closeness

Link 3 <Sleeping & Other Spacial Closeness

Link 4 <Life Arrangements

Link 5  <Urgent Situations

this is way too cool

I always want to do nonsexual closeness with people.

I only skimmed these, but I felt like they were extremely relevant right now.

notfuckingcishet:

goodluckdetective:

*knocks on your door*

Hello. I’ve heard you’ve been invalidating a male character’s past straight relationships in order to make your slash ship sale. 

Could I interest you on the subject of bisexuality.

It’s free! It’s friendly! It’s perfectly workable with canon! It stops misogynistic fic tropes in order to slash ship in it’s tracks.

Invest in bisexuality today!

Bonus: Buy today and receive a free addition of pansexuality for no extra fee!

And if all else fails, try our new product Sexuality is fluid and won’t always be the same someone’s entire goddamn life.

A character can identify as completely monosexual and only attracted to men and can still have had a completely real, completely valid relationship with a woman in the past because the idea that everyone has the exact same sexual identity from birth to the grave is bullshit.

“You see the pattern, folks? When someone says giving rape survivors communication tools is bad, that’s evidence that they’re not supportive of rape survivors communicating. Predator Alert Tool (PAT) elicits such outpourings of rape apologia. So all we need to do is let apologists self-incriminate themselves as apologists by letting them say those things. We then document that interaction & add them to a PAT database. Since the purpose of PAT is to support sexual violence survivors, ID’ing which people don’t support survivors having tools is, well, the point.”

An excerpt from this Facebook discussion.

A side point I, personally, like to make is how the most vocal objection to Predator Alert Tool comes from BDSM’ers betrays the rape apologia on which BDSM is rooted.

Learn more about Predator Alert Tool:

(via maymay)

That thing where you hang out with someone and it’s not explicitly a date, and there’s no likelihood that you’re going to see each other again anytime soon, and it wouldn’t realistically make sense to pursue an explicit date in the future, but still…if it had been a date, it would have been a really nice one.

brngrmln:

bolto:

straight ppl are wild why you needa make out in the line for juice

straight ppl like to make out in stupid spots and then get all weird abt it like “i kissed you in the frozen food section at super walmart i am the reason storms are named after people”

homebeccer:

"oh my god stop criticizing young girls who like 50 Shades of Gray or Twilight you can’t tell them what they can and can’t read"

no we can’t but we have to protect young girls from mistaking abusive behavior for genuine affection at all costs

One of my favorite things that’s happened recently:

I’m visiting a friend of mine and her 21 year old daughter is voraciously re-reading the Twilight series.

ME: So, um…I’m not trying to be a jerk or anything, but I’m just curious. Why are you reading that?

HER: Well, I read them in high school and I was totally obsessed with them, but I think part of the reason I was so into them was because they reminded me of the relationship I was in with my boyfriend at the time. In retrospect, that relationship was totally dysfunctional and kind of abusive. Lately, I’ve been doing a lot of thinking and processing about my feelings for that guy and what was wrong with our relationship, and I thought re-reading Twilight with the perspective I have now might help give me a better understanding of what was going on for me back then.

ME: …You are rad.

teratocybernetics:

tarot-sybarite:

sizvideos:

Video - Follow us

Okay, so there’s this Pulitzer-prize winning article that was published in the Washington Post a couple of years back.  It’s called Fatal Distraction, and in it the author tries to get to the bottom of why these incidents happen.

The profile of the parent who leaves his or his child to die in a hot car is all over the place.  Race, income level, education level, doesn’t matter.  A very small minority have a history of neglect or abuse, but the vast majority are clearly not abusive parents.  If anything, they’re the kind of parents who dote on their children.

So the author asked a memory expert: if the parents are so focused on the well-being of their children in general, how does this possibly happen? And the memory expert explained it thusly:

Firstly, back in the ’90s, car safety experts announced that the airbags on the passenger-side front seat could kill children, and recommended that child safety seats be moved to the back of the car.  Next, shortly afterwards they recommend that to maximize safety for the very, very young, the seats be turned to that they face the rear.

Following these guidelines—which most parents do, in order to protect their children—does protect the child.  It also very effectively removes a child from a parent’s line of sight.

So what?  Who cares if you can’t see the kids?  What kind of parents forget their kid in the back seat of the car?

The memory expert the author spoke to is a molecular physiologist who researches how stress, emotion, and memory interact with each other.  And he has found the following:

For purposes of this discussion, the brain has two zones.  The Upper Zone has the pre-frontal cortex (which thinks and analyzes) and the hippocampus (makes/holds onto immediate memories).  The Lower Zone has the basal ganglia, which handles voluntary but unconscious actions, like swallowing, leg crossing and uncrossing, etc, stuff you choose to do, but don’t really realize you’re making that choice. 

Think of the two Zones as painters.  The Upper Zone is a master of fine and delicate techniques, able to balance several intricate tasks, like a Da Vinci.  The Lower Zone is like the friend that comes over to help you paint your house in exchange for beer and pizza—lots of enthusiasm and energy, but he handles things by flinging paint at the walls. Which does get the job done, admittedly, even if he can’t do much else.

In your brain, Da Vinci and Pizza-and-Beer Guy usually work separately.  But when a job requires familiar, routine motor skills, Da Vinci will buy a six-pack and ask Pizza-and-Beer Guy to come over and help  And they actually work quite well together, for the most part.  Pizza-and-Beer Painter quickly and effectively distributes the paint in the large background areas, and then Da Vinci comes in, tidies up a little, and then starts filling in with the Mona Lisa. 

In real world terms, the neurological Da Vinci + Pizza-and-Beer Guy team-up explains why you can drive to work or school in the morning, and not really recall which route you took to get there or what you saw on the way over.  Da Vinci is in the Upper Zone, organizing your day and reviewing tasks with you, while Pizza-and-Beer Guy is downstairs in the Lower Zone driving your car.  Da Vinci knows that ultimately, the scenery isn’t that important and so doesn’t bother to pay attention to it, while Pizza-and-Beer Guy has all he can handle with getting you safely to work, so he ignores the scenery, too.

The memory expert found that if stressors are introduced in the brain, such as high emotion, lack of sleep, and/or change in routine, then Da Vinci gets overwhelmed trying to manage everything, and Pizza-and-Beer Guy doubles down while still clinging to what he knows. The end result is that Pizza-and-Beer Guy will accidentally paint over large portions  of the Mona Lisa while Da Vinci is dealing with the stress…and Da Vinci won’t notice unless some kind of alarm sounds.

The memory expert then pointed to the case of a mom who exemplified the above:

  • She had been up most of the night babysitting and caring for her own cranky child (stressor: lack of sleep)
  • The tired baby slept in his car seat, instead of babbling like he usually did (no audio reminder of child)
  • Because the mom was planning on bringing the baby’s usual car seat to a fire station for professional installation, the baby was in a different car seat (stressor: change in routine) located behind the driver’s seat where he could not be seen from the rear view mirror (no visual reminder of the child)
  • Because the family’s second car was being loaned to a relative, the mom drove her husband to work that day (stressor: change in routine #2)
  • Because her husband was sitting in the front passenger seat, the baby’s diaper bag was placed in the back seat, instead of in the front passenger seat where the mom could see it (stressor: no visual reminder of child, #2)
  • Because of cell phone conversations with her boss about a crisis at work and with a young relative in trouble, the mom spent most of the drive stressed out solving other people’s problems (stressor: dealing with multiple crises)

This mom’s neurological Da Vinci was swamped dealing with stress. Her neurological Pizza-and-Beer Guy was swamped trying to get her to work that morning.  He painted over the baby, and there were no alarms—no visual or audio reminders—to warn Da Vinci that it had happened.

I say all of that to say this.  Whether or not you leave your baby to die in a hot car has nothing to do with being a fool or loving your kids.  It has to do with unintentional failures of memory under stress.  

Memory is a machine, and it is not perfect.  If you’re capable of forgetting your cell phone, you’re capable of forgetting your child.

Once you understand that, then you can take steps to build in some safeties:

  1. ALWAYS PUT SOMETHING YOU NEED TO HAVE FOR WORK OR SCHOOL IN THE CAR NEXT TO YOUR BABY—your purse, your work ID badge, your laptop or tablet, your cell phone, whatever.  It forces you to look back there, which in turn means you’ll see your baby.
  2. MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH YOUR CHILD CARE PROVIDER THAT THEY WILL ALWAYS CALL YOU IF YOU DON’T SHOW UP WITH YOUR BABY, AND THAT YOU WILL ALWAYS CALL THEM IF YOU DON’T SHOW UP AS SCHEDULED.  If they expect to see you by 8am with the baby, and you’re not there, your cell and your office phone should start ringing at 8:01am.
  3. If you can afford it, consider buying a child alert to let you know that the baby’s still in the car.  The one I linked to consists of a sensor that you attach to the baby’s clothes, and a key chain alarm.  It sounds an alarm on your key chain if you walk more than fifteen feet away from the sensor.  Additional key fobs can be purchased.  Other devices are outlined in this article.

The death of a child left in a car is not a failure of love.  It’s a failure of memory.  And it can happen to anyone.

Visit http://www.kidsandcars.org/ for more info.

SOMEONE REMEMBERED THIS. I read part of the study YEARS ago and couldn’t remember what it was called, but yeah, if you forget the kid’s there at all, and your brain thinks they’re safe, it it’s not a worry anymore, and that’s how shit happens.

carnivaloftherandom:

socimages:

Nope!
Brain studies find that concern for justice and equality is linked to logic, not emotion.
By Lisa Wade, PhD
A new study finds that people with high “justice sensitivity” are using logic, not emotions.  Subjects were put in a fMRI machine, one that measures ongoing brain activity and shown videos of people acting kindly or cruelly toward a homeless person.
Some respondents reacted more strongly than others — hence the high versus low justice sensitivity — and an analysis of the high sensitivity individuals’ brain activity showed that they were processing the images in the parts of the brain where logic and rationality live.   “Individuals who are sensitive to justice and fairness do not seem to be emotionally driven,” explained one of the scientists, “Rather, they are cognitively driven.”
Activists aren’t angry, they reasonably object to unjust circumstances that they understand all too well.
Image borrowed from Jamie Keiles at Teenagerie, who is a high sensitivity individual.
Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College and the author of Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions, with Myra Marx Ferree. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.


Auto-reblog.

carnivaloftherandom:

socimages:

Nope!

Brain studies find that concern for justice and equality is linked to logic, not emotion.

By Lisa Wade, PhD

A new study finds that people with high “justice sensitivity” are using logic, not emotions.  Subjects were put in a fMRI machine, one that measures ongoing brain activity and shown videos of people acting kindly or cruelly toward a homeless person.

Some respondents reacted more strongly than others — hence the high versus low justice sensitivity — and an analysis of the high sensitivity individuals’ brain activity showed that they were processing the images in the parts of the brain where logic and rationality live.   “Individuals who are sensitive to justice and fairness do not seem to be emotionally driven,” explained one of the scientists, “Rather, they are cognitively driven.”

Activists aren’t angry, they reasonably object to unjust circumstances that they understand all too well.

Image borrowed from Jamie Keiles at Teenagerie, who is a high sensitivity individual.

Lisa Wade is a professor of sociology at Occidental College and the author of Gender: Ideas, Interactions, Institutions, with Myra Marx Ferree. You can follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

Auto-reblog.